JH

In Praise of Size, Untidiness and Inconsistency

AA
View Discussion
WD (Bill) Hammond, Serving Suggestion, 1986, acrylic on pegboard, 900 x 1770 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett WD (Bill) Hammond, Animal Vegetable Acrylic, 1988, acrylic on canvas; Brendon Wilkinson: Internal Surface (The Honey Eaters (2004-5)), oil on canvas; An Arm and a Leg (Mt. Eden Train Station), 2001, mixed media. Photo: Sam Hartnett WD (Bill) Hammond, Animal Vegetable Acrylic, 1988, acrylic on canvas, acrylic on canvas. Photo: Sam Hartnett WD (Bill) Hammond, Piano Forte, 1992, (four panels) acrylic on canvas, 1600 x 1800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett WD (Bill) Hammond, The Vagaries of Lingo, 1993, (four panels) acrylic on canvas, 1800 x 1600 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Brendon Wilkinson, Meat Dust, 2006, mixed media on double bed, 1880 x 1370 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Andrew McLeod, Shangri la, 2005, acylic on canvas, 2000 x 2800 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Liz Maw, Mysterious, 2002, oil on board, 2220 x 970 mm; Brendon Wilkinson, Meat Dust, 2006; William Dunning. Antipodean Gothic, acrylic on canvas, 1240 x 5000 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Brendon Wilkinson: Internal Surface (The Honey Eaters), 2004-20050, oil on canvas, 1670 x 1670 mm; An Arm and a Leg (Mt. Eden Train Station), 2001, mixed media; Andrew McLeod, Untitled, 2002, oil on canvas, 2300 x 1650 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett Brendon Wilkinson, An Arm and a Leg (Mt. Eden Train Station), 2001, mixed media. Photo: Sam Hartnett  Andrew McLeod, Untitled, 2002, oil on canvas, 2300 x 1650 mm. Photo: Sam Hartnett WD (Biil) Hammond, Hokey Pokey, 1998, acrylic on canvas, 2000 x 5000 mm (four panels). Photo: Sam Hartnett

If you look closely at the different works by Hammond, McLeod and Wilkinson, you will notice there are two methods at play within each practice. An image or scene can have a clear symbolic reference and historic function within a stated structure (a narrative ‘explanation') - mythic or otherwise. Or a head (say) can inexplicably have two contradictory faces; or a prone body be a landform - both calculatedly flummoxing the viewer through indecision.

Auckland

 

Selected works from a private collection
Antipodean Gothic: Art from a Private Collection
‘Curated’ by ARTHIST 734 Art writing and Curatorial Practice students

 

 September - 1 October 2016

In this highly eccentric but definitely successful show, the notion of ‘curation’ is upended by getting thirteen people to individually pick thirteen works out of a private collection, and although the oddball title (courtesy of William Dunning) is only vaguely pertinent (think ‘Antipodean Gothic,’ you’d normally bring to mind Jason Greig and Leo Bensemann), the cumulative effect is undeniably intriguing.

Firstly, it is fabulously exciting to see some very big quality examples of painting on display in Auckland. For while, for example, Bill Hammond: 23 Big Paintings did come to Auckland Art Gallery in 2000, Bill Hammond: Jingle Jangle Morning (2007- 8) unfortunately didn’t. Classy paintings large in scale are a rare event in Auckland. The last one I saw was Ron Left at AUT.

Hammond dominates this thirteen work exhibition with five paintings and rightly so, while Brendon Wilkinson had three items (one painting, two sculptures), and Andrew McLeod, two. In some expansive spaces these works could look contained or slightly pinched, but even in the comparatively (architecturally) cramped Gus Fisher they look supremely elegant. The hang is exemplary.

With the Hammonds, four are of the ‘humanoid /suburban neurosis’ variety, and one is of the later ‘shag/spirit people’ type. Personally I prefer the earlier, rawer, less slick works, and here there are two that consist of four butted-together canvases, each group collectively forming a big rectangle. I enjoy the angularity and roughness of Hammond’s execution; its unpredictability (controlled sloppiness) of paint application and image, plus the fact they are disruptively more about head comics, the deformities of Jim Nutt’s gender wars, and ‘straight’ satire (attacking orthodox careerism) than languid fantasies about pre-human Pacific history.

Of the thirteen selected items, six (the four earlier Hammonds - The Vagaries of Lingo, Serving Suggestion, Piano Forte, Animal Vegetable Acrylic - plus Andrew McLeod’s Shangri La, and Brendon Wilkinson’s Meat Dust) are what I’d call plot-shredding or anti-narrative works. Their images tend to be highly ambiguous; nothing is really definite, so meaning is constantly deferred or evaded. The other works are not so slippery, their semantic significance does not waver; their meaning is clear, mythical symbolism being fixed and underpinning layers stated. (Here I include: Hammond’s Hokey Pokey, paintings by Liz Maw, William Dunning, Anne Wallace, Andrew McLeod’s heavily botanical Untitled, Brendon Wilkinson’s ‘Edenic’ painting Internal Surface, and his sculpture, An Arm and a Leg (Mt. Eden Train Station).

I realise I may now be accused of being over reductive, for the two mindsets do sometimes overlap, but if you look closely at the different works by Hammond, McLeod and Wilkinson, you will notice there are two methods at play within each practice. An image or scene can have a clear symbolic reference or narrative function within a stated structure - mythic or otherwise. Or a head (say) can inexplicably have two contradictory faces; or a prone body also be a landform - made to calculatedly flummox the indecisive viewer. These images have a formal wit or entertainment value, but in the context of their whole composition, they are not part of any bigger story. The former (‘narratives’) tend to have deep perspectival space while the latter (‘meaning disrupters’) usually hug the picture plane.

Okay…here is another speculation to chew over: With electronic advertising (moving image signboards) now beginning to take over every street corner within the CBD - replacing conventional signage - large paintings are starting to become more and more antiquated as curiosities with static images: becoming rarer and rarer in private homes or corporate offices. Video art (with loops) might well replace them, especially if daily encountering of moving image onscreen (outside as ‘urban landscape’ and in the office, or home) becomes the new norm. Perhaps large format, static imagery (purchasable through dealers) will not be able to compete in the rush to attract new audiences. The pleasures of looking at static painted imagery might even die out, like a lost (soon to be forgotten) language.

Antipodean Gothic is an exciting show of ‘traditional’ work that has been around for approximately one and a half decades. It comes with a nice catalogue of thirteen very smart essays written by the thirteen selectors. If you feel that maybe New Zealand art has gone off the boil (including possibly even Hammond?) over the last ten or fifteen years, this presentation provides you with something definite to think about - to help evaluate.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Ralph Paine, À la Leibnitz, eight framed drawings of watercolour and pencil. Each 230 x 310 mm.

Paine as Fan Boy

CHARLES NINOW

Auckland

 

Ralph Paine
Leaves From a Pillow Book

 

December 5 - December 21, 2024

JH
Installation shot of Veronica Herber's Making My Way Home exhibition at Melanie Roger.

Herber’s Torn Tape Graphite Grids

MELANIE ROGER GALLERY

Auckland

 

Veronica Herber
Making My Way Home


14 November - 7 December 2024

JH
Heather Straka, Age of Discovery The Painter, 2021, archival pigment on Photorag Ultrasmooth, 765 x 1135 mm.

Constructed Straka Photographs

TRISH CLARK GALLERY

Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland

 

Heather Straka
Isolation Hotel

 

26 November - 21 December 2024

JH
Winston Roeth, Belmont Quintet, 2024, Kremer pigments and polyurethane dispersion on five slate panels, 50,8 x 168.4 cm

The Pleasures of Chromatic Individuality

FOX JENSEN MCCRORY

Auckland

 

Winston Roeth
The Unbearable Lightness of Seeing

 

16 November - 14 December 2024