Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.


The Pleasures of Thin Agitated Glazes

View Discussion
Marie Le Lievre works at Antoinette Godkin, from l. to r.: Lady Swine Bag, 2011; Pistol, 2011; Boxed (Lamp black) 2011. Marie Le Lievre, Pistol, 2011, oil on canvas, 710 x 760 mm Marie Le Lievre, Boxed (Lamp Black) 2011, oil on canvas, 1860 x 1620 mm Marie Le Lievre, Witch Bag, 2011, oil on canvas, 310 x 310 mm Marie Le Lievre, Boombox, 2010, oil on canvas, 400 x 400mm Marie Le Lievre, Tranzister, 2011, oil on canvas, oil on canvas, 400 x 300 mm Marie Le Lievre, Day Tripped, 2011, oil on canvas, 900 x 900 mm Marie Le Lievre, Keepsakes, 2011, oil on canvas, 900 x 900 mm Marie Le Lievre, Portrait, 2011, oil on canvas, 900 x 900 mm

So how would these works be read, for example, if a feminist rhetoric is intended? Is it an oblique reference to, say, the often discussed sacrifices Lee Krasner and Elaine de Kooning made as painters, playing secondary roles and eclipsed by their husbands Pollock and de Kooning?



Marie Le Lievre
Day Tripped


6 July - 30 July 2011

With her title Day Tripped alluding to the Beatles, and a painting style that comes from the post war developments of the early fifties, particularly lyrical abstraction, Christchurch painter Marie le Lievre’s much glazed, oozy show holds a curious position when seen in Auckland - especially when compared with local products like the cool minimalism of Noel Ivanoff, the ‘thinking’ machinery of Simon Ingram, and the convulsive angular layering of James Cousins.

Her work is openly sensual and spontaneously composed - focussing on manually applied, dribbbly, streaky washes and agitated glowing hues. These are  contained in organic blobby shapes hovering in pale fields. In a post-conceptualist era they do inevitably look dated, although with the current summer issue of artforum having a cover story on ‘the ab ex effect’, Le Lievre’s methodology of delicate but turbulent overlapping puddles may well be very much in vogue.

Even though she studied at Canterbury where the main painting tutor is Roger Boyce, a Californian, the feel of Le Lievre’s work is more European than American - in fact it’s churning, rivuletted sensibility reminds me very much of the paintings of some of Rudolf Gopas’ students in the early seventies. (Gopas’ teaching at Ilam is considered the font of expressionism in New Zealand art history.)

Her best works in my view are imposing in scale (not domestically oriented) so you can bodily ‘enter’ the space and explore the intricate textures of the paint application. They also have less dominant shapes floating on a softer background. In other words, they succeed where the field they are inserted into is lacking in tonal contrast and textured with thin washes, so they are ‘in’ not ‘on’. The backgrounds tend to be too dominant. The dark shapes over-exert their influence inside the pale rectangle.

Many works are of handbag shapes - using charcoal squiggles or watery strokes as handles - bringing in a narrative and seemingly an attempt to literalise the forms and position them within gender politics.

So how would these works be read, if for example, a feminist rhetoric is intended? Is it an oblique reference to, say, the often discussed sacrifices Lee Krasner and Elaine de Kooning made as painters, playing secondary roles and eclipsed by their husbands Pollock and de Kooning? Is it more about the medium, ie. painting itself - in contradistinction to photography which, in the eighties, some women embraced in opposition to painting because of the latter’s masculinist historical associations?

Perhaps they are just bags, rather than handbags, and so open receptacles for any meaning that prevents the works from being perceived as ‘purely abstract’? ‘Real’ palpable objects loaded in rich associations, connected to daily life existence and not rarefied abstraction, a collection of visual qualities embedded in certain manipulated materials and studio methodologies.

The titles here I think intrude. They are too obviously literal and distract by over-determining. In fact I wish Le Lievre had not attempted titles at all. Just ignored the conventions of labelling each exhibited item - even the use of ‘untitled’ or numbering in sequences these days is crass - and let the problem of identification be sorted by viewer and dealer; if such a problem exists. Let the intensely pleasurable experience of looking at these paintings be the only focus, and not treat them as a form of illustration - with obligatory caption - that disallows opportunities for interpretation.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email


Recent Posts by John Hurrell


Is There a Need for More Humour in New Zealand Art?

the stories of five to ten people: comedy in art
Edited (with an essay for this curated show of 12 artists) by Bryce Galloway

The Engine Room (Massey University) Wellington, February 2021

Luca Nicholas, Grindr Study #12, 2017, intaglio on Fabriano Artistico paper, 765 x 560 mm; image 395 x 395 mm.

Grindr goes Intaglio




Luca Nicholas
Studies 2017 - 18


11 February - 20 March 2021

Paul Johns, BEEN HERE LONG? 2020, rocks, neon, transformers, wood, acrylic and stainless steel, 905 x 1455 x 1085 mm

Paul Johns Exhibition




Paul Johns
Been Here Long?

11 February - 20 March 2021

Installation of Denis O'Connor's 'Double Kiss' at Two Rooms. Photo: Sam Hartnett

O’Connor, Theatre and Beckett




Denis O’Connor
Double Kiss

5 February - 6 March 2021