Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

More Carved Dexterity from Gentry

AA
View Discussion
Regan Gentry, Bombs 12 -13, carved and glued pumice Regan Gentry, some of Bombs 1 -9, carved and glued pumice Regan Gentry, Extinguish, carved and glued pumice Regan Gentry, Floating installed at Whitespace Regan Gentry, POP (Bottle), carved and glued pumice Regan Gentry, Floating installed at Whitespace Regan Gentry, Floating Land, South (lilo), carved and glued pumice

Referencing volcanic ‘bombs' (ejected molten rocks wider than 65 mm across) Gentry has made a variety of pock-marked weapons (balls with wicks, finned canisters) and enlarged children's projectiles that allude to explosive forces, and also recreational objects like balloons, lilos and inner tubes that refer to hovering or floating, that exploit the gaseous weight-supporting properties of enclosed air.

Auckland

 

Regan Gentry
Floating

 

14 February - 4 March 2012

Regan Gentry is well known for his ‘debut’ public art work, Foot in the Door (2004), photographing a foot long ruler jammed into every accepting art institution’s front entrance. It attracted many sighs of admiration for its sheer gall: an unknown artist cockily knocking on municipal gallery doors, openly hustling to get in their collections. Other works, like the gorse carvings shown at Te Tuhi, are different. They are more sociological, exploring history and the gorse plant’s impact on our rural culture.

This current Whitespace exhibition shows off Gentry’s carving expertise again, but this time using laminations of volcanic pumice, different coloured and textured chunks of aerated hokey-pokey rock, glued, shaped and sanded. It is a show that has fun with language without being conceptual - for it flirts with, without developing, ideas. The titles or subject matter create excuses (intellectual justifications - if required) for making objects but not going far beyond their physical properties or simple punning.

Referencing volcanic ‘bombs’ (ejected molten rocks wider than 65 mm across) he has made a variety of pock-marked weapons (balls with wicks, finned canisters) and enlarged children’s projectiles that allude to explosive forces, and also recreational objects like balloons, lilos and inner tubes that refer to hovering or floating, that exploit the gaseous weight-supporting properties of enclosed air.

There is also a large carved skull which exploits the worn, slightly bubbly texture old bones sometimes have, as if made with an ossifying liquid poured into a mould and left to set.

From this we can see that properties inherent within the carved substance dictate the subject matter and implied narrative. Yet if he wished Gentry could be wilder in his imagery, more theatrical and dreamlike - perhaps introducing human figures, using ‘floating’ as an existential metaphor for bare survival. There’s a Bob Dylan line: people don’t live or die, people just float that hints of that, plus a whiff of the transmigration of souls.

With this material my view is that Gentry could exploit his manual dexterity further by moving into a more immersive presentation, getting away from discrete art objects, and incorporating instead many multiple elements hanging from the ceiling (as some do here) - using space as a dynamic ingredient within his practice. So far the advantages of the lightness of pumice have only been hinted at.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

This Discussion has 2 comments.

Comment

Owen Pratt, 10:02 a.m. 1 March, 2012

Volcanic bombs are formed by molten lava being expelled from the eruption and solidifying in various distinct forms; hence the more common name, lava bomb. Pumice is material formed by the gaseous effervescence of a volcanic eruption and does not feature the typical forms of the volcanic bomb. Pumice floats, lava bombs sink; or am I missing the point?

http://facweb.bhc.edu/academics/science/harwoodr/GEOL101/Labs/VolcanicMaterials/

Reply to this thread

John Hurrell, 10:26 a.m. 1 March, 2012

Excellent comment Owen. Thanks for pointing that out. The implication is that Regan, and maybe myself, have confused the two. I guess the fact that both come out of volcanoes allows him to play with the word 'bomb' and make a pumice weapon.

Reply to this thread

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Justine Varga, End of Violet (72Y50.5M10c), 2022,chromogenic photograph, 1599 x 1250 mm (framed)

Varga’s Painterly Cameraless Photographs

TWO ROOMS

Auckland

 

Justine Varga
End of Violet

 

7 June - 13 July 2024

 

JH
Still from Susan Norrie's Spheres of Influence. 2016-19. Single channel video, 26.44 minutes

Pondering Iraq

TWO ROOMS

Auckland


Susan Norrie
Spheres of Influence


7 June -17 July 2024

JH
Detail of John Reynolds' Some Greater Plan (for Claire) #9, 2024, metallic marker, acrylic on canvas, 213.30 x 152.30 cm

John Reynolds Paintings

STARKWHITE

Auckland


John Reynolds
Some Greater Plan (for Claire)


4 June - 6 July 2024

 

JH
Max Gimblett, The Wild One, 2022, acrylic polyester, water-based size, 22kt gold, platinum, Japanese dyed silver, blue varigated leaves on poly-cotton canvas, 203.2 x 165.1 cm

Excessive and Restrained Gimblett

GOW LANGSFORD GALLERY

Auckland

 

Max Gimblett
Hands of Gold


5 June - 29 June 2024