Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

McLeod Mattters

AA
View Discussion

…They are funny - if you get amusement from seeing an exemplary talent like McLeod mock his own compositional abilities. Yet this artist always has enjoyed excess and plentitude. Modernist restraint and understatement are not something he happens to empathise with. His ratbag hybridity - in his own terms (not mine) - makes a lot of sense.

Auckland

 

Andrew McLeod

Ocean

 

1 April - 23 April 2009

 

We have here a varied range of oil paintings (and one digital print) from this Auckland artist - among them a few surprises. The very recent McLeod paintings are interesting in that they show a moving away from the playschool, Killeen influenced, ambience of earlier works, towards a more sensual, lush painting.  In other words, they are less illustrative, being instead Romantic, elemental and other worldly. Very physical. They have a sweeping, immersive rawness, mostly without his ‘normal’ finicky, anal fastidiousness. They are very dramatic, particularly the images of the sea, and indicate a serious interest in the paintings of the German artist Arnold Böcklin (1827 -1901).

I find these images of McLeod’s intriguing. I warm to them more than his other paintings - this is surprising for I personally don’t like Böcklin’s work very much. I find it somewhat histrionic. McLeod’s images though have a gruntiness and comparative roughness which I enjoy. And the symbolic content doesn’t seem in earnest. McLeod here loves drama. It is the blatant theatricality and hammy humour he is going for (er, this is what I assume), and it works.

Placed in the same rooms though are the odd, very small geometric paintings he has been doing for some time - modernist works influenced by LeWitt, Vasarely, Albers and others. These experiments in reductive geometry and perspective are humorous too, because of their extravagantly ornate frames, not because of the geometry. Ostentatious and vulgar the incompatible borders are perversely placed around the dynamic geometry so that many viewers (like myself) grind their teeth. The format is maddeningly irritating, for the distracting frames set out to obliterate the carefully designed spatial contents of the internal canvases.

In that sense they are funny - if you get amusement from seeing an exemplary talent like McLeod mock his own compositional abilities. Yet this artist always has enjoyed excess and plentitude. Modernist restraint and understatement are not something he happens to empathise with. His ratbag hybridity - in his own terms (not mine) - makes a lot of sense.

- John Hurrell 

 

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Jerome Ngan-Kee: four paintings on the short wall.

Using AI for ‘Drawn’ / Linear Text Paintings

CHARLES NINOW

Jerome Ngan-Kee

 

Realism

 

14 February - 7 March 2026

JH
Julian Hooper, Setting Up, 2025, acrylic on canvas, 700 x 800 mm

Julian Hooper’s Ornate (But Diagramatic) Variety of Surrealism

IVAN ANTHONY GALLERY

Julian Hooper

 

Bones


4 February - 7 March 2026

JH
Pip Culbert, Zodiac, 1995, rubber, buckles, rope, eyelets, dimensions variable

Pip Culbert Sampler

FOX JENSEN MCCRORY

Pip Culbert

 

Anti-Utilitarian


February - March 2026

JH
David Shrigley, Untitled (Contemporary Performance Art), 2024, ink on paper, 500 x 375 mm, framed

Deliriously Weird Shrigley Drawings

TWO ROOMS

David Shrigley


Works on Paper


10 February - 7 March 2026