Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

McLeod Mattters

AA
View Discussion

…They are funny - if you get amusement from seeing an exemplary talent like McLeod mock his own compositional abilities. Yet this artist always has enjoyed excess and plentitude. Modernist restraint and understatement are not something he happens to empathise with. His ratbag hybridity - in his own terms (not mine) - makes a lot of sense.

Auckland

 

Andrew McLeod

Ocean

 

1 April - 23 April 2009

 

We have here a varied range of oil paintings (and one digital print) from this Auckland artist - among them a few surprises. The very recent McLeod paintings are interesting in that they show a moving away from the playschool, Killeen influenced, ambience of earlier works, towards a more sensual, lush painting.  In other words, they are less illustrative, being instead Romantic, elemental and other worldly. Very physical. They have a sweeping, immersive rawness, mostly without his ‘normal’ finicky, anal fastidiousness. They are very dramatic, particularly the images of the sea, and indicate a serious interest in the paintings of the German artist Arnold Böcklin (1827 -1901).

I find these images of McLeod’s intriguing. I warm to them more than his other paintings - this is surprising for I personally don’t like Böcklin’s work very much. I find it somewhat histrionic. McLeod’s images though have a gruntiness and comparative roughness which I enjoy. And the symbolic content doesn’t seem in earnest. McLeod here loves drama. It is the blatant theatricality and hammy humour he is going for (er, this is what I assume), and it works.

Placed in the same rooms though are the odd, very small geometric paintings he has been doing for some time - modernist works influenced by LeWitt, Vasarely, Albers and others. These experiments in reductive geometry and perspective are humorous too, because of their extravagantly ornate frames, not because of the geometry. Ostentatious and vulgar the incompatible borders are perversely placed around the dynamic geometry so that many viewers (like myself) grind their teeth. The format is maddeningly irritating, for the distracting frames set out to obliterate the carefully designed spatial contents of the internal canvases.

In that sense they are funny - if you get amusement from seeing an exemplary talent like McLeod mock his own compositional abilities. Yet this artist always has enjoyed excess and plentitude. Modernist restraint and understatement are not something he happens to empathise with. His ratbag hybridity - in his own terms (not mine) - makes a lot of sense.

- John Hurrell 

 

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
 Wim van den Heever, image courtesy Wildlife Photgrapher of the Year 2025

Sumptuous & Dramatic Nature Photography

Auckland War Memorial Museum

 

Wildlife Photographer of the Year

 

28 June - 30 August 2026

JH
et al., the fundamental practice, 2005, Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki, with the support of the Patrons of the Auckland Art Gallery, 2008. Installation view: 51st Venice Biennale, 2005. Photograph by Jennifer French.

What Avant-Garde?

AUCKLAND ART GALLERY TOI O TAMAKI

et al.

 

the fundamental practice

 

8 August - 15 November 2026

JH

Darragh’s Pungent Planetary Critique

TWO ROOMS

Judy Darragh

 

Pool

 

22 July - 17 August 2026

JH

Glorious Exuberant Hybridity

AUCKLAND ART GALLERY TOI O TAMAKI

Yuki Kihara


Samoa no Uta. A Song About Samoa - Taiheiyo (Pacific) 2023

Samoan siapo (featuring barkcloth from the mulberry tree), textiles, felt, beads, plastic, kimonos: 1750 x 1410 x 250 mm each, installation dimensions variable.