Nau mai, haere mai, welcome to EyeContact. You are invited to respond to reviews and contribute to discussion by registering to participate.

JH

An Unusual Pairing

AA
View Discussion
Fiona Clark, Chris Dickenson, Mr America 1970, Mr Universe 1974 and Grand Prix 1980 winner, Auckland, 1980, Vintage C-Type handprint on Agfacolor Paper, printed 1981, 250 x 365 mm (paper size). Fiona Clark, Mike Cole, runner-up Mr Pan Paci c 1980, Mr Auckland 1980 and third Mr New Zealand 1981, Auckland, 1980, Vintage C-Type handprint on Agfacolor Paper, printed 1981, 250 x 365 mm (paper size) Fiona Clark, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mr Olympia 1980, Sydney, 1980, Vintage C-Type handprint on Agfacolor Paper, printed 1981 250 x 365 mm (paper size) Fiona Clark, Boyer Coe, Mr Universe contestant and Mr Olympia,1980, Sydney, 1980, Vintage C-Type handprint on Agfacolor Paper, printed 1981, 250 x 365 mm (paper size) Installation of Dan Arps and Fiona Clark at Michael Lett. Dan Arps, Composition with blind (brown bronze), 2019, bronze, brown patina, 245 x 345 mm Dan Arps, Untitled (Contained/Free), 2019, acrylic on printed fabric diptych, 2000 x 3000mm Dan Arps, Untitled (Contained/Free), 2019, acrylic on printed fabric diptych, 2000 x 3000 mm Dan Arps, Seated Figure, 2018, bronze, patina, 140 x 140 x 155 mm Dan Arps, Figure Study (Larger), 2019, epoxy putty, 3D printed PLA, acrylic paint, 260 x 180 x 300 mm, overall with plinth, 1325 x 375 x 600 mm Dan Arps, Motherhood Redux, 2019, polyurethane, paint, 190 x 270 x 280 mm, overall with plinth 1100 x 395 x 395 mm Installation of Dan Arps and Fiona Clark at Michael Lett. Installation of Dan Arps and Fiona Clark at Michael Lett.

I had forgotten about Fiona Clark's ‘musclemen' photographs taken in Sydney and Auckland in 1980. They have an emotional and a cerebral content, often showing the anxiety on the faces of the body-building contestants, but also presenting a sort of caricature of masculinity, looking at the performative: a posing process where a heightened exposure of worked-on muscles is intensified (to be admired or assessed) and then—after a brief duration—released.

Auckland

 

Dan Arps and Fiona Clark
Fiona Clark and Dan Arps

 

31 July - 31 August 2019

I was quite surprised when I noticed these two (quite different) artists being put together like this, and a bit suspicious of bland gallery marketing, but on seeing the show: the combination works well. I didn’t expect it.

I had forgotten about Fiona Clark’s ‘musclemen’ photographs taken in Sydney and Auckland in 1980. They have an emotional and a cerebral content, often showing the anxiety on the faces of the body-building contestants, but also presenting a sort of caricature of masculinity (whatever that is), looking at the performative: a posing process where a heightened exposure of worked-on muscles is intensified (to be admired or assessed) and then—after a brief duration—released. Her fourteen coloured indoor images are lined up on the long end wall opposite the windows.

Her project fits in well with Dan Arps’ sculptures and paintings (in the central ground-floor space) which have a processual element, an interest in time and sequential (casting) procedure—plus a level of cultivated chaos not found in Clark.

Clark’s photographs illustrate control from both artist and depicted subject, while Arps is more about juxtaposing unexpected elements, and entertaining through surprise by playing with generic art conventions—privileging ‘low’ art sources over ‘high’; ‘rubbish’ over ‘masterpieces’; off-cuts over designed shape; children’s art over adults’; plinths (which are really furtive four-sided paintings) over sculptures from which they seem to be inseparable anyway; the ‘unruly’ over the ‘elegant’; the ‘unfinished’ over the ‘refined’. Much of this undermining is in the tradition of the Gambia Castle group he used to be part of.

With Clark and her documented flexing competitors there is the heightened moment of perfection—the desired zenith of achievement—whereas for Arps what he (often but not always) presents is anything but: a hostility to normative aspirations of beauty (it goes beyond Duchampian indifference); a reversal of striving; a love of process; a rejection of any cognisance of a peak that is wished for; no hoped-for pinnacle to be attained.

John Hurrell

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by John Hurrell

JH
Jerome Ngan-Kee: four paintings on the short wall.

Using AI for ‘Drawn’ / Linear Text Paintings

CHARLES NINOW

Jerome Ngan-Kee

 

Realism

 

14 February - 7 March 2026

JH
Julian Hooper, Setting Up, 2025, acrylic on canvas, 700 x 800 mm

Julian Hooper’s Ornate (But Diagramatic) Variety of Surrealism

IVAN ANTHONY GALLERY

Julian Hooper

 

Bones


4 February - 7 March 2026

JH
Pip Culbert, Zodiac, 1995, rubber, buckles, rope, eyelets, dimensions variable

Pip Culbert Sampler

FOX JENSEN MCCRORY

Pip Culbert

 

Anti-Utilitarian


February - March 2026

JH
David Shrigley, Untitled (Contemporary Performance Art), 2024, ink on paper, 500 x 375 mm, framed

Deliriously Weird Shrigley Drawings

TWO ROOMS

David Shrigley


Works on Paper


10 February - 7 March 2026