KL

Blurring the Cognitive and the Physical

AA
View Discussion
James Oram, Old Brain Prospect, 2014, altered hat, altered table frame, gold plated chain, clay. Photo: Daegan Wells. James Oram, Old Brain Prospect, 2014, altered hat, altered table frame, gold plated chain, clay. Photo: Daegan Wells. James Oram, Old Brain Prospect, 2014, gib, plaster, monitor, projector. Photo: Daegan Wells. James Oram, Old Brain Prospect, 2014, gib, plaster, monitor, projector. Photo: Daegan Wells. James Oram, Tracking, 2014, HD video, 9 mins, 11 secs. Photo: Daegan Wells. James Oram, Old Brain Prospect, 2014, altered chair frame, attention bells. Photo: Daegan Wells. James Oram, Old Brain Prospect, 2014, gold plated chain, clay. Photo: Daegan Wells.

If we attempt to analyse works of art from a broadly phenomenological perspective, that is to say through an effort to construct accounts of them as experienced phenomena, then we begin to work within a paradigm closely aligned with aspects of applied psychology. This strain of empiricist analysis comes and goes within contemporary criticism, but often clusters around the predominantly formal and non-referential structures of post-minimal sculpture.

Christchurch

 

James Oram,
Old Brain Prospect,

 

5 April - 27 April 2014

A black baseball cap studded and festooned with gold chain hangs on a black metal structure, an adapted desk frame. The chain is artfully draped, swags bunching around the steel bars. On the floor, more gold chain delineates a staring eye, while a pyramid of glass and receptionist’s bells reminiscent of a cake stand sits on a chair. Off to the side, a large white structure displays video work:, one projection, one on a monitor. The monitor again uses a motif of eyes, this time ones that move and twitch.

In this way, Old Brain Prospect, James Oram’s latest exhibition at Dog Park Art Project Space, maintains a formal vocabulary of hard surfaces and cool textures. For a show at Dog Park, normally comparatively sparse, the gallery feels full, and Oram’s work seems surprisingly bulky, particularly the large structure that operates as a support for the video work. This structure, made from thinly white-painted MDF, is about the size of an office desk, with rising partitions that suggest cubicles or booths. Because of the partitioning and shelving devices it uses, the viewer must traverse the space around the structure to view the videos, and the relationship between the viewer and video is constrained and defined in a certain way.

Sophie Davis’ accompanying text provides a field of context for these objects. This field is the range of practices that run from those of neuroscience or psychology more broadly, through to the less rigorous, more market-driven operations of neuro-marketing and pop-psychology. In particular, the cap can now be read as an EEG device, a mechanism for measuring electrical activity in the brain, while the bells mounted on the chair take on a Pavlovian dimension, and the eyes associate themselves with attempts to understand reading and looking by the detailed tracking of eyeball movements.

If we attempt to analyse works of art from a broadly phenomenological perspective, that is to say through an effort to construct accounts of them as experienced phenomena, then we begin to work within a paradigm closely aligned with aspects of applied psychology. This strain of empiricist analysis comes and goes within contemporary criticism, but often clusters around the predominantly formal and non-referential structures of post-minimal sculpture.

Within that paradigm, the eye, and the eye’s position with reference to the work, becomes the central term. In his treatment of Richard Serra’s large scale commission for the Duveen Galleries at the Tate, David Sylvester emphasises the absolute importance of miniscule differences in height. The minute relative shift between above and below eye level becomes fundamentally important to how we perceive the work. Similarly, the process of walking, of movement, becomes important, not just in itself, but also as a way of gaining a new vantage point, a new vista. For somebody like Yves-Alain Bois, for example, this means that Serra’s work becomes almost picturesque, almost garden-like, in its insistence on the viewer’s placement and movement in space.

Oram’s work, as Davis’ text suggest, is coming into this discussion from the point of view of a certain form of contemporary neuroscience, one that is attempting to construct accounts of the subject’s cognitive and physical processes when confronted with certain things. Within this paradigm, the distinction between the physical and the cognitive begins to dissolve, and the boundaries of the mind and body blur and meld. The tools of this paradigm are the EEG cap, the eye tracker, and the fMRI, - Oram represents those tools to us in the show. The overlaps between this paradigm and that of phenomenological criticism place any critic trained in - and tending towards - such a methodology in a self-reflexive position. To discuss the minute shifts of attention and posture, to practice the introspective self-analysis that phenomenology often demands, is a similar process of attempting to deconstruct the cognitive process that the neuroscientist, or perhaps the marketing executive, is engaged with.

Keir Leslie

Print | Facebook | Twitter | Email

 

Recent Posts by Keir Leslie

KL
David Haines and Joyce Hinterding, Geology 2015. Installation view, Energies: Haines & Hinterding, Museum of Contemporary Art Australia, 2015. Commissioned by the MCA, supported by Christchurch Art Gallery Te Puna o Waiwhetu. Photo: C. Snee

Haines and Hinterding in Christchurch

CHRISTCHURCH ART GALLERY TE PUNA O WAIWHETU

Christchurch

 

Joyce Hinterding and David Haines
Energies

 

26 November 2016 - 5 March 2017

KL
Matt Akehurst, Object 38, 2015, plywood, builders filler and paint, 444 X 525 mm

Neate and Akehurst at Chambers

Chambers@241

Christchurch

 

Robin Neate / Matt Akehurst
Show Me Something Quieter / Works

 

3 November - 21 November 2015

KL
Ella Sutherland's Boring month start to finish, the whole month, at North Projects.  Photo: Daegen Wells

Pondering the Puzzles Page

NORTH PROJECTS

Christchurch

 

Ella Sutherland
Boring month start to finish, the whole month

 

12 September - 17 October 2015

KL
Zina Swanson, For Luck, 2015, multi media installation at Dunedin Public Art Gallery. Courtesy of the artist.

Swanson’s Bathroom

DUNEDIN PUBLIC ART GALLERY

Dunedin

 

Zina Swanson
For Luck

 

30 May 2015 - 30 August 2015